🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing chorus of nations are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our kids' innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to enact a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a good starting point," commented the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and fit for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some politicians to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this international debate evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.